Peugeot e-5008 210 Allure (2024–) vs XPeng G6 AWD Performance (2025–2026): which costs less?
Total cost at 15,000 km/yr: Peugeot e-5008 210 Allure (2024–) €812/mo · XPeng G6 AWD Performance (2025–2026) €787/mo. XPeng G6 AWD Performance (2025–2026) stays the cheaper car across all usage profiles (8,000–30,000 km/yr).
The trade-offs
- XPeng G6 AWD Performance (2025–2026) costs about €25 less per month at 15,000 km/yr.
- XPeng G6 AWD Performance (2025–2026) goes 8 km further in real −10 °C conditions.
- XPeng G6 AWD Performance (2025–2026) spends 22 minutes less at fast chargers over a 600 km trip.
- XPeng G6 AWD Performance (2025–2026) has 223 l more boot space.
Side by side
| Peugeot e-5008 210 Allure (2024–) | XPeng G6 AWD Performance (2025–2026) | |
|---|---|---|
| List price | €51,150 (better) | €51,600 |
| €/month (15,000 km) | €812 | €787 (better) |
| €/month (25,000 km) | €931 | €910 (better) |
| Range (WLTP) | 502 km | 510 km (better) |
| Footprint (L×W, excl. mirrors) | 9.08 m² | 9.14 m² |
| Real range (mild/cold) | 450 km / 359 km | 457 km / 367 km (better) |
| 600 km long trip | 2 charging stops · +37 min | 2 charging stops · +15 min (better) |
| Consumption (WLTP) | 17.8 kWh/100 km (better) | 18.4 kWh/100 km |
| Battery | 73.0 kWh | 80.0 kWh |
| Max DC charge | 160 kW | 451 kW (better) |
| 0–100 km/h | 9.7 s | 4.1 s (better) |
| Boot | 348 L | 571 L (better) |
| Seats | 7 | 5 |
Break-even by mileage
| km/yr | Peugeot e-5008 210 Allure (2024–) | XPeng G6 AWD Performance (2025–2026) |
|---|---|---|
| 10,000 | €752 | €725 |
| 15,000 | €812 | €787 |
| 20,000 | €871 | €849 |
| 25,000 | €931 | €910 |
| 30,000 | €990 | €971 |
Compare interactively → · Peugeot e-5008 210 Allure (2024–): cost deep-dive · XPeng G6 AWD Performance (2025–2026): cost deep-dive