Evident
★
⚙
Applies to the interactive figures (Entdecken, compare, calculator) — page copy stays in € and km.Theme

Methodology

How Evident computes the monthly total cost of ownership (TCO). All figures are estimates with an effective date — no guarantee. Every number is either an official value, a sourced market figure, or a clearly labelled model — and we say which.

List prices: gross list price (UVP incl. 19% VAT, excluding delivery/registration fees) — treated identically across all makes, including Tesla (fees noted in the source). Checked prices carry "price checked on …" with a source; unchecked ones are labelled "price unconfirmed" and enter no ranking.

Depreciation (the biggest item): where published 3-year residuals exist we use them as anchors (table below, with source and mileage basis). All other models use a segment approximation labelled as an estimate. In parallel we are building our own residual model on weekly-collected market data — it replaces the approximation once it demonstrably beats the anchors.

Battery degradation: fleet studies show modest degradation (Arval, 24,000 certificates: ~93% capacity at 70,000 km) — so battery health is a minor factor in our used-car residuals.

Energy: electricity or fuel from consumption × price, weighted by your charging mix (home/public). BEV real-world consumption comes from the gap model (per segment, fixed mild/−10 °C reference scenarios, DWD-weighted annual factor — details below). PHEV: real fuel use ≈ 3× WLTP for private usage (ICCT/Fraunhofer ISI 2022, n≈9,000; EU OBFCM fleet figure 3.5×) — the measured net including electric share; charged electricity is not billed separately here (conservative, in favour of the PHEV).

Real-world range: the WLTP range divided by the gap factor for the scenario (mild or −10 °C, below). The gap model is calibrated grid-side (charging losses included) while range comes out of the battery, so we take 8% charging losses off first (ADAC wallbox measurement). Cars with only an NEFZ figure (registered before ~2018) are scaled by ×0.88 to a WLTP equivalent first — otherwise older cars would read systematically optimistic. The same conversion applies inversely to NEDC consumption (÷0.88) before the gap model multiplies it; the input is always the homologation figure, never a measurement — the gap comes from the model, or it would be counted twice.

Long trip (600 km): a fixed reference run so cars stay comparable — leave full, arrive with 10% left, and charge only what the rest of the trip needs (never past 80%, where the curve goes flat). Motorway consumption = real-world consumption × 1.35; charging time comes from a modelled DC curve per cell chemistry (LFP holds a broad plateau, NMC peaks earlier and tapers longer) — where the maker states a 10–80% time (ADAC Autokatalog, for 400-odd cars) the curve is scaled to take exactly that long, never above the peak power. The figure is time at the plug only — pulling off, parking and paying are not modelled.

Tax: Kfz-Steuer from displacement + CO₂ above a 95 g/km allowance — the statutory formula, not a model; BEVs are temporarily exempt (first registration through 2030, up to 2035).

Insurance: estimated from list price (a comprehensive-cover proxy) × a class factor × Regionalklasse (postcode). 413 models already use their real GDV Vollkasko type class (official register 09/2025); the class→factor curve is a documented assumption pending quote calibration. Remaining models: power-band approximation.

Maintenance: a flat rate per drivetrain (EVs cheaper) — a sourced table, not a model.

Bonuses: the THG quota (BEV only) and the income-tested 2026 purchase grant are subtracted — statutory rules, not a model.

Financing (optional): if you enter the share of the price you finance + your own effective APR, we show the interest as a separate line (an amortising loan over the holding period). It is your rate, never an invented one — information only, not credit brokerage. Left blank, the line does not appear.

Total cost over the holding period: the €/month total × holding months — the "all in" figure beside the rate. Pure multiplication, not an extra model.

In short: depreciation, PHEV energy and insurance are modelled approximations, not quotes. Use the number to compare, not as a guarantee.

Price checks: 491 of 492 shown cars carry a check date — oldest 11 Jul 2026, newest 27 Sept 2026. A check date does not decay into "unconfirmed"; it states when the list price was last verified.

Published residual-value anchors (3 years) (As of 11 Jul 2026)

These models use published residuals instead of the segment approximation. "Basis" is the source's mileage assumption; listing studies are market observations, not forecasts.

Model3-yr residualBasisSource
Tesla Model Y56 %36m/60000kmecomento.de + autobild.de 03.06.2026 (Bähr & Fess) — Premium Max. Reichweite AWD; bestes E-Auto im Werterhalt
Tesla Model 353 %36m/60000kmecomento.de + autobild.de 03.06.2026 (Bähr & Fess) — Hinterradantrieb
VW ID.348.8 %36m, km n/aecomento.de 25.03.2026 + autobild.de 28.03.2026 (Carvago-Listungsstudie) — Listungsvergleich, keine Prognose
VW ID.453.9 %36m, km n/aecomento.de 25.03.2026 + autobild.de 28.03.2026 (Carvago-Listungsstudie)
VW ID.553.9 %36m, km n/awie ID.4 (kein separater ID.5-Wert publiziert) — ID.4-Wert übernommen; Coupé-Aufschlag unbekannt
Skoda Enyaq48.3 %36m, km n/aecomento.de 25.03.2026 + autobild.de 28.03.2026 (Carvago-Listungsstudie)
Cupra Born44 %36m/60000kmautobild.de 07.04.2026 (Schwacke) — hohe Leasingrückläufer-Volumina
Hyundai Kona47.7 %36m, km n/aecomento.de 25.03.2026 (Carvago-Listungsstudie) — ersetzt unbelegte 0.58; Blog-Quelle widerlegt
Audi Q445.3 %36m/60000kmautobild.de 16.05.2026 (Schwacke) — 'Nur die elektrischen Modelle schwächeln'
BYD Atto 342.8 %36m/60000kmautobild.de 09.02.2026 (Schwacke) — schwächstes von 6 BYD-Modellen
BYD Seal U51.9 %36m/60000kmautobild.de 09.02.2026 (Schwacke) — Seal (Limousine) 51,9 % — als Näherung für Seal-Familie; Seal U DM-i (PHEV) 56,6 %
BYD Atto 250.2 %36m/60000kmautobild.de 09.02.2026 (Schwacke)
BYD Dolphin Surf41.1 %36m/60000kmautobild.de 09.02.2026 (Schwacke)
BYD Dolphin44.6 %36m/60000kmautobild.de 09.02.2026 (Schwacke)
Smart #154 %36m/60000kmkfz-betrieb.vogel.de 11.07.2024 (Schwacke) — VORSICHT: Stand Mitte 2024
Mini Aceman53 %36m/60000kmecomento.de 03.06.2026 (Bähr & Fess) — E Essential; Top-3 im Bähr-&-Fess-Werterhalt-Ranking (verifiziert 2026-07-21)
Renault Twingo50 %36m/60000kmecomento.de 03.06.2026 (Bähr & Fess) — E-Tech Evolution 80 Urban Range
Mercedes CLA50 %36m/60000kmecomento.de 03.06.2026 (Bähr & Fess) — CLA mit EQ-Technik; gilt modellweit (250+/Shooting Brake/350 4MATIC)
Peugeot e-20846.4 %36m, km n/aecomento.de 25.03.2026 (Carvago-Listungsstudie) — Wertverlust 53,6 % → 0,464 gehalten
Audi e-tron 5549.3 %36m, km n/aecomento.de 25.03.2026 (Carvago-Listungsstudie) — e-tron 55 (2019-2022 Kohorte, deckt nicht Q4/Q6/Q8); Wertverlust 50,7 % → 0,493
Audi A657.1 %36m/60000kmautobild.de 06.10.2025 (Wertmeister 2025, Schwacke) — A6 Avant e-tron gewann als erster reiner Stromer eine Wertmeister-Gesamtkategorie; Näherung für A6 Sportback e-tron
Volvo EX9055.5 %36m/60000kmautobild.de 06.10.2025 (Wertmeister 2025, Schwacke)
Skoda Elroq59.3 %36m/60000kmautobild.de 04.05.2025 (Skoda-Restwertprognose, Schwacke) — Schwacke 36 Monate / 20.000 km-Jahr
Skoda Epiq54 %36m/60000kmautobild.de 2026 (Bähr & Fess, Restwert-Spezialist) — Epiq 55 Essence; Bähr-&-Fess-Vorserien-Prognose; verifiziert 2026-07-21
Porsche Taycan48.9 %36m/60000kmautobild.de 06.05.2026 (Schwacke, 'Porsche: Restwerte im Check') — verifiziert 2026-07-21
Porsche Macan51.5 %36m/60000kmautobild.de 06.05.2026 (Schwacke, 'Porsche: Restwerte im Check') — Macan Electric; verifiziert 2026-07-21
Audi e-tron GT41.7 %36m/60000kmautobild.de 16.05.2026 (Schwacke, 'Audi: Restwerte im Check') — verifiziert 2026-07-21

Market benchmarks

Our own market data (used listings)

Since week 28, 2026 we collect, weekly and ourselves, the prices used EVs are listed at in Germany: per model line the median of 20–40 fresh listings with their median age and mileage — 13 weeks (to week 40, 2026), 20 model lines. These medians appear as “Market ↺” on car pages, cost pages, head-to-heads and in the comparator. Rules: listings are asking prices, not transaction prices; the comparison is always against our estimate for exactly the listings' median age, never a blanket 3-year figure; trends only from two full 4-week windows (means of weekly medians), because a single weekly median swings by double digits on composition alone. The same data trains our residual model (release status: model health). Market Radar → · Model health →

Key assumptions (2026-01-01)

These values are read straight from the live cost model and the anchor table (no duplicated copy). Each figure carries its source and date on the car page; the model gates are on Model health.