Citroen e-C5 Aircross 210 Komfort Range (2025–) vs KGM Musso EV Core 2WD (2025–): which costs less?
Citroen e-C5 Aircross 210 Komfort Range (2025–)€688/month
KGM Musso EV Core 2WD (2025–)€680/monthcheaperTotal cost at 15,000 km/yr: Citroen e-C5 Aircross 210 Komfort Range (2025–) €688/mo · KGM Musso EV Core 2WD (2025–) €680/mo. From roughly 20,000 km/yr the picture flips — the other model becomes cheaper.
The trade-offs
- KGM Musso EV Core 2WD (2025–) costs about €8 less per month at 15,000 km/yr.
- Citroen e-C5 Aircross 210 Komfort Range (2025–) goes 54 km further in real −10 °C conditions.
Side by side
| Citroen e-C5 Aircross 210 Komfort Range (2025–) | KGM Musso EV Core 2WD (2025–) | |
|---|---|---|
| List price | €42,590 | €41,990 (better) |
| €/month (15,000 km) | €688 | €680 (better) |
| €/month (25,000 km) | €799 (better) | €818 |
| Range (WLTP) | 520 km (better) | 420 km |
| Footprint (L×W, excl. mirrors) | 8.70 m² | 9.91 m² |
| Real range (mild/cold) | 466 km / 368 km (better) | 377 km / 314 km |
| 600 km long trip | 2 charging stops · +35 min | — |
| Consumption (WLTP) | 17.0 kWh/100 km (better) | 23.0 kWh/100 km |
| Battery | 73.0 kWh | 80.6 kWh |
| Max DC charge | 160 kW (better) | 120 kW |
| 0–100 km/h | 9.4 s | 9.2 s (better) |
| Boot | 565 L | — |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
Break-even by mileage
| km/yr | Citroen e-C5 Aircross 210 Komfort Range (2025–) | KGM Musso EV Core 2WD (2025–) |
|---|---|---|
| 10,000 | €632 | €610 |
| 15,000 | €688 | €680 |
| 20,000 | €744 | €749 |
| 25,000 | €799 | €818 |
| 30,000 | €855 | €887 |
Compare interactively → · Citroen e-C5 Aircross 210 Komfort Range (2025–): cost deep-dive · KGM Musso EV Core 2WD (2025–): cost deep-dive