Citroen e-Berlingo M 50 kWh (2024–) vs Kia PV5 Passenger 71.2 kWh (2025–2026): which costs less?
Citroen e-Berlingo M 50 kWh (2024–)€684/monthcheaper
Kia PV5 Passenger 71.2 kWh (2025–2026)€742/monthTotal cost at 15,000 km/yr: Citroen e-Berlingo M 50 kWh (2024–) €684/mo · Kia PV5 Passenger 71.2 kWh (2025–2026) €742/mo. Citroen e-Berlingo M 50 kWh (2024–) stays the cheaper car across all usage profiles (8,000–30,000 km/yr).
The trade-offs
- Citroen e-Berlingo M 50 kWh (2024–) costs about €58 less per month at 15,000 km/yr.
- Kia PV5 Passenger 71.2 kWh (2025–2026) goes 54 km further in real −10 °C conditions.
- Kia PV5 Passenger 71.2 kWh (2025–2026) spends 21 minutes less at fast chargers over a 600 km trip.
- Kia PV5 Passenger 71.2 kWh (2025–2026) has 555 l more boot space.
Side by side
| Citroen e-Berlingo M 50 kWh (2024–) | Kia PV5 Passenger 71.2 kWh (2025–2026) | |
|---|---|---|
| List price | €39,720 (better) | €42,390 |
| €/month (15,000 km) | €684 (better) | €742 |
| €/month (25,000 km) | €796 (better) | €861 |
| Range (WLTP) | 343 km | 412 km (better) |
| Footprint (L×W, excl. mirrors) | 8.14 m² | 8.90 m² |
| Real range (mild/cold) | 310 km / 247 km | 373 km / 301 km (better) |
| 600 km long trip | 3 charging stops · +73 min | 2 charging stops · +52 min (better) |
| Consumption (WLTP) | 18.0 kWh/100 km (better) | 19.3 kWh/100 km |
| Battery | 46.0 kWh | 71.2 kWh |
| Max DC charge | 100 kW | 150 kW (better) |
| 0–100 km/h | 11.7 s | 10.6 s (better) |
| Boot | 775 L | 1330 L (better) |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
Break-even by mileage
| km/yr | Citroen e-Berlingo M 50 kWh (2024–) | Kia PV5 Passenger 71.2 kWh (2025–2026) |
|---|---|---|
| 10,000 | €628 | €682 |
| 15,000 | €684 | €742 |
| 20,000 | €740 | €802 |
| 25,000 | €796 | €861 |
| 30,000 | €852 | €921 |
Compare interactively → · Citroen e-Berlingo M 50 kWh (2024–): cost deep-dive · Kia PV5 Passenger 71.2 kWh (2025–2026): cost deep-dive