Peugeot e-5008 230 Long Range (2025–) vs Skoda Enyaq Coupé RS (2025–2026): which costs less?
Total cost at 15,000 km/yr: Peugeot e-5008 230 Long Range (2025–) €970/mo · Skoda Enyaq Coupé RS (2025–2026) €983/mo. From roughly 25,000 km/yr the picture flips — the other model becomes cheaper.
The trade-offs
- Peugeot e-5008 230 Long Range (2025–) costs about €13 less per month at 15,000 km/yr.
- Peugeot e-5008 230 Long Range (2025–) goes 89 km further in real −10 °C conditions.
- Peugeot e-5008 230 Long Range (2025–) spends 8 minutes less at fast chargers over a 600 km trip.
- Skoda Enyaq Coupé RS (2025–2026) has 222 l more boot space.
Side by side
| Peugeot e-5008 230 Long Range (2025–) | Skoda Enyaq Coupé RS (2025–2026) | |
|---|---|---|
| List price | €63,350 | €62,140 (better) |
| €/month (15,000 km) | €970 (better) | €983 |
| €/month (25,000 km) | €1,096 | €1,096 |
| Range (WLTP) | 669 km (better) | 562 km |
| Footprint (L×W, excl. mirrors) | 9.08 m² | 8.76 m² |
| Real range (mild/cold) | 600 km / 480 km (better) | 504 km / 391 km |
| 600 km long trip | 1 charging stop · +18 min (better) | 2 charging stops · +26 min |
| Consumption (WLTP) | 18.1 kWh/100 km | 15.8 kWh/100 km (better) |
| Battery | 96.9 kWh | 79.0 kWh |
| Max DC charge | 160 kW | 185 kW (better) |
| 0–100 km/h | 9.6 s | 5.4 s (better) |
| Boot | 348 L | 570 L (better) |
| Seats | 7 | 5 |
Break-even by mileage
| km/yr | Peugeot e-5008 230 Long Range (2025–) | Skoda Enyaq Coupé RS (2025–2026) |
|---|---|---|
| 10,000 | €907 | €927 |
| 15,000 | €970 | €983 |
| 20,000 | €1,033 | €1,040 |
| 25,000 | €1,096 | €1,096 |
| 30,000 | €1,159 | €1,151 |
Compare interactively → · Peugeot e-5008 230 Long Range (2025–): cost deep-dive · Skoda Enyaq Coupé RS (2025–2026): cost deep-dive