Peugeot e-408 Allure (2025–2026) vs Tesla Model 3 Premium AWD (2025–2026): which costs less?
Total cost at 15,000 km/yr: Peugeot e-408 Allure (2025–2026) €743/mo · Tesla Model 3 Premium AWD (2025–2026) €771/mo. Peugeot e-408 Allure (2025–2026) stays the cheaper car across all usage profiles (8,000–30,000 km/yr).
The trade-offs
- Peugeot e-408 Allure (2025–2026) costs about €28 less per month at 15,000 km/yr.
- Tesla Model 3 Premium AWD (2025–2026) goes 136 km further in real −10 °C conditions.
- Tesla Model 3 Premium AWD (2025–2026) spends 27 minutes less at fast chargers over a 600 km trip.
- Tesla Model 3 Premium AWD (2025–2026) has 126 l more boot space.
Side by side
| Peugeot e-408 Allure (2025–2026) | Tesla Model 3 Premium AWD (2025–2026) | |
|---|---|---|
| List price | €46,300 (better) | €49,990 |
| €/month (15,000 km) | €743 (better) | €771 |
| €/month (25,000 km) | €846 (better) | €875 |
| Range (WLTP) | 456 km | 660 km (better) |
| Footprint (L×W, excl. mirrors) | 8.66 m² | 8.73 m² |
| Used market (median listing, our own collection) | — | €29,999 · Ø 3.3 yr · n=37 (week 40, 2026) |
| Real range (mild/cold) | 406 km / 311 km | 588 km / 447 km (better) |
| 600 km long trip | 2 charging stops · +43 min | 1 charging stop · +16 min (better) |
| Consumption (WLTP) | 14.7 kWh/100 km | 14.3 kWh/100 km (better) |
| Battery | 58.2 kWh | 79.0 kWh |
| Max DC charge | 120 kW | 250 kW (better) |
| 0–100 km/h | 7.2 s | 4.4 s (better) |
| Boot | 468 L | 594 L (better) |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
Break-even by mileage
| km/yr | Peugeot e-408 Allure (2025–2026) | Tesla Model 3 Premium AWD (2025–2026) |
|---|---|---|
| 10,000 | €692 | €720 |
| 15,000 | €743 | €771 |
| 20,000 | €795 | €823 |
| 25,000 | €846 | €875 |
| 30,000 | €898 | €926 |
Compare interactively → · Peugeot e-408 Allure (2025–2026): cost deep-dive · Tesla Model 3 Premium AWD (2025–2026): cost deep-dive

