Lucid Air Pure RWD (2024–) vs Nio ET5 Long Range 100 kWh AWD: which costs less?
Total cost at 15,000 km/yr: Lucid Air Pure RWD (2024–) €1,211/mo · Nio ET5 Long Range 100 kWh AWD €1,034/mo. Nio ET5 Long Range 100 kWh AWD stays the cheaper car across all usage profiles (8,000–30,000 km/yr).
The trade-offs
- Nio ET5 Long Range 100 kWh AWD costs about €176 less per month at 15,000 km/yr.
- Lucid Air Pure RWD (2024–) goes 71 km further in real −10 °C conditions.
- Lucid Air Pure RWD (2024–) has 241 l more boot space.
Side by side
| Lucid Air Pure RWD (2024–) | Nio ET5 Long Range 100 kWh AWD | |
|---|---|---|
| List price | €85,900 | €68,500 (better) |
| €/month (15,000 km) | €1,211 | €1,034 (better) |
| €/month (25,000 km) | €1,325 | €1,165 (better) |
| Range (WLTP) | 747 km (better) | 590 km |
| Footprint (L×W, excl. mirrors) | 9.63 m² | 9.39 m² |
| Real range (mild/cold) | 665 km / 494 km (better) | 526 km / 423 km |
| 600 km long trip | — | 1 charging stop · +35 min |
| Consumption (WLTP) | 13.0 kWh/100 km (better) | 18.6 kWh/100 km |
| Battery | 88.0 kWh | 90.0 kWh |
| Max DC charge | 210 kW (better) | 125 kW |
| 0–100 km/h | 4.7 s | 4.0 s (better) |
| Boot | 627 L (better) | 386 L |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
Break-even by mileage
| km/yr | Lucid Air Pure RWD (2024–) | Nio ET5 Long Range 100 kWh AWD |
|---|---|---|
| 10,000 | €1,153 | €968 |
| 15,000 | €1,211 | €1,034 |
| 20,000 | €1,268 | €1,100 |
| 25,000 | €1,325 | €1,165 |
| 30,000 | €1,382 | €1,230 |
Compare interactively → · Lucid Air Pure RWD (2024–): cost deep-dive · Nio ET5 Long Range 100 kWh AWD: cost deep-dive