Ford E-Tourneo Custom 340 L1 Trend (2025–) vs Mercedes EQV 300 (2024–2026): which costs less?
Ford E-Tourneo Custom 340 L1 Trend (2025–)€1,004/monthcheaper
Mercedes EQV 300 (2024–2026)€1,119/monthTotal cost at 15,000 km/yr: Ford E-Tourneo Custom 340 L1 Trend (2025–) €1,004/mo · Mercedes EQV 300 (2024–2026) €1,119/mo. Ford E-Tourneo Custom 340 L1 Trend (2025–) stays the cheaper car across all usage profiles (8,000–30,000 km/yr).
The trade-offs
- Ford E-Tourneo Custom 340 L1 Trend (2025–) costs about €115 less per month at 15,000 km/yr.
- Mercedes EQV 300 (2024–2026) goes 22 km further in real −10 °C conditions.
- Mercedes EQV 300 (2024–2026) spends 4 minutes less at fast chargers over a 600 km trip.
- Mercedes EQV 300 (2024–2026) has 738 l more boot space.
Side by side
| Ford E-Tourneo Custom 340 L1 Trend (2025–) | Mercedes EQV 300 (2024–2026) | |
|---|---|---|
| List price | €61,702 (better) | €71,388 |
| €/month (15,000 km) | €1,004 (better) | €1,119 |
| €/month (25,000 km) | €1,153 (better) | €1,288 |
| Range (WLTP) | 339 km | 361 km (better) |
| Footprint (L×W, excl. mirrors) | 10.26 m² | 10.35 m² |
| Real range (mild/cold) | 307 km / 258 km | 327 km / 280 km (better) |
| 600 km long trip | 3 charging stops · +93 min | 3 charging stops · +89 min (better) |
| Consumption (WLTP) | 24.1 kWh/100 km (better) | 27.5 kWh/100 km |
| Battery | 70.0 kWh | 90.0 kWh |
| Max DC charge | 125 kW (better) | 110 kW |
| 0–100 km/h | — | 12.1 s |
| Boot | 672 L | 1410 L (better) |
| Seats | 8 | 6 |
Break-even by mileage
| km/yr | Ford E-Tourneo Custom 340 L1 Trend (2025–) | Mercedes EQV 300 (2024–2026) |
|---|---|---|
| 10,000 | €929 | €1,034 |
| 15,000 | €1,004 | €1,119 |
| 20,000 | €1,078 | €1,203 |
| 25,000 | €1,153 | €1,288 |
| 30,000 | €1,227 | €1,372 |
Compare interactively → · Ford E-Tourneo Custom 340 L1 Trend (2025–): cost deep-dive · Mercedes EQV 300 (2024–2026): cost deep-dive