Cupra Tavascan VZ 4Drive (2026–) vs Ford Mustang Mach-E ER RWD (2025–): which costs less?
Total cost at 15,000 km/yr: Cupra Tavascan VZ 4Drive (2026–) €835/mo · Ford Mustang Mach-E ER RWD (2025–) €845/mo. Cupra Tavascan VZ 4Drive (2026–) stays the cheaper car across all usage profiles (8,000–30,000 km/yr).
The trade-offs
- Cupra Tavascan VZ 4Drive (2026–) costs about €9 less per month at 15,000 km/yr.
- Ford Mustang Mach-E ER RWD (2025–) goes 56 km further in real −10 °C conditions.
- Ford Mustang Mach-E ER RWD (2025–) spends 5 minutes less at fast chargers over a 600 km trip.
- Cupra Tavascan VZ 4Drive (2026–) has 21 l more boot space.
Side by side
| Cupra Tavascan VZ 4Drive (2026–) | Ford Mustang Mach-E ER RWD (2025–) | |
|---|---|---|
| List price | €58,950 (better) | €59,200 |
| €/month (15,000 km) | €835 (better) | €845 |
| €/month (25,000 km) | €955 (better) | €968 |
| Range (WLTP) | 527 km | 600 km (better) |
| Footprint (L×W, excl. mirrors) | 8.64 m² | 8.87 m² |
| Real range (mild/cold) | 472 km / 372 km | 538 km / 428 km (better) |
| 600 km long trip | 2 charging stops · +33 min | 1 charging stop · +28 min (better) |
| Consumption (WLTP) | 16.7 kWh/100 km (better) | 17.7 kWh/100 km |
| Battery | 77.0 kWh | 88.0 kWh |
| Max DC charge | 135 kW | 150 kW (better) |
| 0–100 km/h | 5.5 s (better) | 6.1 s |
| Boot | 540 L (better) | 519 L |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
Break-even by mileage
| km/yr | Cupra Tavascan VZ 4Drive (2026–) | Ford Mustang Mach-E ER RWD (2025–) |
|---|---|---|
| 10,000 | €775 | €782 |
| 15,000 | €835 | €845 |
| 20,000 | €895 | €907 |
| 25,000 | €955 | €968 |
| 30,000 | €1,014 | €1,030 |
Compare interactively → · Cupra Tavascan VZ 4Drive (2026–): cost deep-dive · Ford Mustang Mach-E ER RWD (2025–): cost deep-dive