Evident
★
⚙
Applies to the interactive figures (Entdecken, compare, calculator) — page copy stays in € and km.Theme

Citroen e-C5 Aircross 210 Komfort Range (2025–) vs Skoda Enyaq 60 Essence (2026–): which costs less?

Total cost at 15,000 km/yr: Citroen e-C5 Aircross 210 Komfort Range (2025–) €688/mo · Skoda Enyaq 60 Essence (2026–) €721/mo. Citroen e-C5 Aircross 210 Komfort Range (2025–) stays the cheaper car across all usage profiles (8,000–30,000 km/yr).

The trade-offs

Side by side

Citroen e-C5 Aircross 210 Komfort Range (2025–)Skoda Enyaq 60 Essence (2026–)
List price€42,590 (better)€43,490
€/month (15,000 km)€688 (better)€721
€/month (25,000 km)€799 (better)€823
Range (WLTP)520 km (better)455 km
Footprint (L×W, excl. mirrors)8.70 m²8.75 m²
Used market (median listing, our own collection)—€34,660 · Ø 3.1 yr · n=32 (week 40, 2026)
Real range (mild/cold)466 km / 368 km (better)408 km / 313 km
600 km long trip2 charging stops · +35 min (better)2 charging stops · +40 min
Consumption (WLTP)17.0 kWh/100 km15.0 kWh/100 km (better)
Battery73.0 kWh58.0 kWh
Max DC charge160 kW (better)105 kW
0–100 km/h9.4 s8.6 s (better)
Boot565 L585 L (better)
Seats55

Break-even by mileage

km/yrCitroen e-C5 Aircross 210 Komfort Range (2025–)Skoda Enyaq 60 Essence (2026–)
10,000€632€670
15,000€688€721
20,000€744€772
25,000€799€823
30,000€855€873

Compare interactively → · Citroen e-C5 Aircross 210 Komfort Range (2025–): cost deep-dive · Skoda Enyaq 60 Essence (2026–): cost deep-dive