Citroen e-C5 Aircross 210 Komfort Range (2025–) vs MG MGS5 EV 64 kWh (2025–): which costs less?
Total cost at 15,000 km/yr: Citroen e-C5 Aircross 210 Komfort Range (2025–) €688/mo · MG MGS5 EV 64 kWh (2025–) €715/mo. Citroen e-C5 Aircross 210 Komfort Range (2025–) stays the cheaper car across all usage profiles (8,000–30,000 km/yr).
The trade-offs
- Citroen e-C5 Aircross 210 Komfort Range (2025–) costs about €27 less per month at 15,000 km/yr.
- Citroen e-C5 Aircross 210 Komfort Range (2025–) goes 35 km further in real −10 °C conditions.
- Citroen e-C5 Aircross 210 Komfort Range (2025–) spends 2 minutes less at fast chargers over a 600 km trip.
- Citroen e-C5 Aircross 210 Komfort Range (2025–) has 112 l more boot space.
Side by side
| Citroen e-C5 Aircross 210 Komfort Range (2025–) | MG MGS5 EV 64 kWh (2025–) | |
|---|---|---|
| List price | €42,590 (better) | €42,990 |
| €/month (15,000 km) | €688 (better) | €715 |
| €/month (25,000 km) | €799 (better) | €819 |
| Range (WLTP) | 520 km (better) | 480 km |
| Footprint (L×W, excl. mirrors) | 8.70 m² | 8.28 m² |
| Real range (mild/cold) | 466 km / 368 km (better) | 430 km / 333 km |
| 600 km long trip | 2 charging stops · +35 min (better) | 2 charging stops · +37 min |
| Consumption (WLTP) | 17.0 kWh/100 km | 15.5 kWh/100 km (better) |
| Battery | 73.0 kWh | 62.1 kWh |
| Max DC charge | 160 kW (better) | 139 kW |
| 0–100 km/h | 9.4 s | 6.3 s (better) |
| Boot | 565 L (better) | 453 L |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
Break-even by mileage
| km/yr | Citroen e-C5 Aircross 210 Komfort Range (2025–) | MG MGS5 EV 64 kWh (2025–) |
|---|---|---|
| 10,000 | €632 | €662 |
| 15,000 | €688 | €715 |
| 20,000 | €744 | €767 |
| 25,000 | €799 | €819 |
| 30,000 | €855 | €871 |
Compare interactively → · Citroen e-C5 Aircross 210 Komfort Range (2025–): cost deep-dive · MG MGS5 EV 64 kWh (2025–): cost deep-dive