Cadillac Optiq Premium Sport AWD (2026–) vs Ford Mustang Mach-E ER AWD (2025–): which costs less?
Cadillac Optiq Premium Sport AWD (2026–)€967/month
Ford Mustang Mach-E ER AWD (2025–)€942/monthcheaperTotal cost at 15,000 km/yr: Cadillac Optiq Premium Sport AWD (2026–) €967/mo · Ford Mustang Mach-E ER AWD (2025–) €942/mo. Ford Mustang Mach-E ER AWD (2025–) stays the cheaper car across all usage profiles (8,000–30,000 km/yr).
The trade-offs
- Ford Mustang Mach-E ER AWD (2025–) costs about €25 less per month at 15,000 km/yr.
- Ford Mustang Mach-E ER AWD (2025–) goes 89 km further in real −10 °C conditions.
- Ford Mustang Mach-E ER AWD (2025–) spends 21 minutes less at fast chargers over a 600 km trip.
- Ford Mustang Mach-E ER AWD (2025–) has 76 l more boot space.
Side by side
| Cadillac Optiq Premium Sport AWD (2026–) | Ford Mustang Mach-E ER AWD (2025–) | |
|---|---|---|
| List price | €65,000 (better) | €66,600 |
| €/month (15,000 km) | €967 | €942 (better) |
| €/month (25,000 km) | €1,103 | €1,077 (better) |
| Range (WLTP) | 425 km | 550 km (better) |
| Footprint (L×W, excl. mirrors) | 9.22 m² | 8.87 m² |
| Real range (mild/cold) | 381 km / 310 km | 493 km / 399 km (better) |
| 600 km long trip | 2 charging stops · +59 min | 2 charging stops · +38 min (better) |
| Consumption (WLTP) | 19.9 kWh/100 km | 19.3 kWh/100 km (better) |
| Battery | 75.0 kWh | 88.0 kWh |
| Max DC charge | 110 kW | 150 kW (better) |
| 0–100 km/h | 6.3 s | 4.8 s (better) |
| Boot | 443 L | 519 L (better) |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
Break-even by mileage
| km/yr | Cadillac Optiq Premium Sport AWD (2026–) | Ford Mustang Mach-E ER AWD (2025–) |
|---|---|---|
| 10,000 | €899 | €875 |
| 15,000 | €967 | €942 |
| 20,000 | €1,035 | €1,010 |
| 25,000 | €1,103 | €1,077 |
| 30,000 | €1,171 | €1,143 |
Compare interactively → · Cadillac Optiq Premium Sport AWD (2026–): cost deep-dive · Ford Mustang Mach-E ER AWD (2025–): cost deep-dive