BMW iX xDrive60 (2025–) vs Volvo ES90 Twin Motor Performance AWD (2025–): which costs less?
Total cost at 15,000 km/yr: BMW iX xDrive60 (2025–) €1,415/mo · Volvo ES90 Twin Motor Performance AWD (2025–) €1,352/mo. Volvo ES90 Twin Motor Performance AWD (2025–) stays the cheaper car across all usage profiles (8,000–30,000 km/yr).
The trade-offs
- Volvo ES90 Twin Motor Performance AWD (2025–) costs about €63 less per month at 15,000 km/yr.
- BMW iX xDrive60 (2025–) goes 5 km further in real −10 °C conditions.
- Volvo ES90 Twin Motor Performance AWD (2025–) spends 6 minutes less at fast chargers over a 600 km trip.
- BMW iX xDrive60 (2025–) has 58 l more boot space.
Side by side
| BMW iX xDrive60 (2025–) | Volvo ES90 Twin Motor Performance AWD (2025–) | |
|---|---|---|
| List price | €99,900 | €93,790 (better) |
| €/month (15,000 km) | €1,415 | €1,352 (better) |
| €/month (25,000 km) | €1,556 | €1,484 (better) |
| Range (WLTP) | 701 km | 706 km (better) |
| Footprint (L×W, excl. mirrors) | 9.78 m² | 9.71 m² |
| Real range (mild/cold) | 633 km / 504 km (better) | 637 km / 499 km |
| 600 km long trip | 1 charging stop · +15 min | 1 charging stop · +9 min (better) |
| Consumption (WLTP) | 17.9 kWh/100 km | 16.5 kWh/100 km (better) |
| Battery | 109.1 kWh | 103.0 kWh |
| Max DC charge | 195 kW | 350 kW (better) |
| 0–100 km/h | 4.6 s | 4.0 s (better) |
| Boot | 500 L (better) | 442 L |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
Break-even by mileage
| km/yr | BMW iX xDrive60 (2025–) | Volvo ES90 Twin Motor Performance AWD (2025–) |
|---|---|---|
| 10,000 | €1,343 | €1,286 |
| 15,000 | €1,415 | €1,352 |
| 20,000 | €1,486 | €1,418 |
| 25,000 | €1,556 | €1,484 |
| 30,000 | €1,627 | €1,549 |
Compare interactively → · BMW iX xDrive60 (2025–): cost deep-dive · Volvo ES90 Twin Motor Performance AWD (2025–): cost deep-dive