Alpine A390 GT (2026–) vs Ford Mustang Mach-E ER AWD (2025–): which costs less?
Total cost at 15,000 km/yr: Alpine A390 GT (2026–) €982/mo · Ford Mustang Mach-E ER AWD (2025–) €942/mo. Ford Mustang Mach-E ER AWD (2025–) stays the cheaper car across all usage profiles (8,000–30,000 km/yr).
The trade-offs
- Ford Mustang Mach-E ER AWD (2025–) costs about €40 less per month at 15,000 km/yr.
- Ford Mustang Mach-E ER AWD (2025–) goes 1 km further in real −10 °C conditions.
- Alpine A390 GT (2026–) spends 8 minutes less at fast chargers over a 600 km trip.
- Alpine A390 GT (2026–) has 13 l more boot space.
Side by side
| Alpine A390 GT (2026–) | Ford Mustang Mach-E ER AWD (2025–) | |
|---|---|---|
| List price | €67,500 | €66,600 (better) |
| €/month (15,000 km) | €982 | €942 (better) |
| €/month (25,000 km) | €1,114 | €1,077 (better) |
| Range (WLTP) | 551 km (better) | 550 km |
| Footprint (L×W, excl. mirrors) | 8.70 m² | 8.87 m² |
| Real range (mild/cold) | 494 km / 398 km | 493 km / 399 km (better) |
| 600 km long trip | 2 charging stops · +30 min (better) | 2 charging stops · +38 min |
| Consumption (WLTP) | 18.7 kWh/100 km (better) | 19.3 kWh/100 km |
| Battery | 89.0 kWh | 88.0 kWh |
| Max DC charge | 150 kW | 150 kW |
| 0–100 km/h | 4.8 s | 4.8 s |
| Boot | 532 L (better) | 519 L |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
Break-even by mileage
| km/yr | Alpine A390 GT (2026–) | Ford Mustang Mach-E ER AWD (2025–) |
|---|---|---|
| 10,000 | €916 | €875 |
| 15,000 | €982 | €942 |
| 20,000 | €1,049 | €1,010 |
| 25,000 | €1,114 | €1,077 |
| 30,000 | €1,180 | €1,143 |
Compare interactively → · Alpine A390 GT (2026–): cost deep-dive · Ford Mustang Mach-E ER AWD (2025–): cost deep-dive