Peugeot e-3008 230 Long Range (2025–) vs Skoda Enyaq RS (2026–): which costs less?
Total cost at 15,000 km/yr: Peugeot e-3008 230 Long Range (2025–) €919/mo · Skoda Enyaq RS (2026–) €947/mo. Peugeot e-3008 230 Long Range (2025–) stays the cheaper car across all usage profiles (8,000–30,000 km/yr).
The trade-offs
- Peugeot e-3008 230 Long Range (2025–) costs about €28 less per month at 15,000 km/yr.
- Peugeot e-3008 230 Long Range (2025–) goes 103 km further in real −10 °C conditions.
- Peugeot e-3008 230 Long Range (2025–) spends 13 minutes less at fast chargers over a 600 km trip.
- Skoda Enyaq RS (2026–) has 65 l more boot space.
Side by side
| Peugeot e-3008 230 Long Range (2025–) | Skoda Enyaq RS (2026–) | |
|---|---|---|
| List price | €60,850 | €59,440 (better) |
| €/month (15,000 km) | €919 (better) | €947 |
| €/month (25,000 km) | €1,040 (better) | €1,058 |
| Range (WLTP) | 698 km (better) | 562 km |
| Footprint (L×W, excl. mirrors) | 8.61 m² | 8.76 m² |
| Used market (median listing, our own collection) | — | €34,660 · Ø 3.1 yr · n=32 (week 40, 2026) |
| Real range (mild/cold) | 626 km / 495 km (better) | 504 km / 392 km |
| 600 km long trip | 1 charging stop · +16 min (better) | 2 charging stops · +29 min |
| Consumption (WLTP) | 17.2 kWh/100 km | 15.9 kWh/100 km (better) |
| Battery | 96.9 kWh | 77.0 kWh |
| Max DC charge | 160 kW | 165 kW (better) |
| 0–100 km/h | 8.7 s | 5.4 s (better) |
| Boot | 520 L | 585 L (better) |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
Break-even by mileage
| km/yr | Peugeot e-3008 230 Long Range (2025–) | Skoda Enyaq RS (2026–) |
|---|---|---|
| 10,000 | €858 | €891 |
| 15,000 | €919 | €947 |
| 20,000 | €980 | €1,003 |
| 25,000 | €1,040 | €1,058 |
| 30,000 | €1,100 | €1,114 |
Compare interactively → · Peugeot e-3008 230 Long Range (2025–): cost deep-dive · Skoda Enyaq RS (2026–): cost deep-dive