Peugeot e-3008 325 Allure AWD (2026–) vs Skoda Enyaq 85 (2026–): which costs less?
Total cost at 15,000 km/yr: Peugeot e-3008 325 Allure AWD (2026–) €800/mo · Skoda Enyaq 85 (2026–) €826/mo. Peugeot e-3008 325 Allure AWD (2026–) stays the cheaper car across all usage profiles (8,000–30,000 km/yr).
The trade-offs
- Peugeot e-3008 325 Allure AWD (2026–) costs about €26 less per month at 15,000 km/yr.
- Skoda Enyaq 85 (2026–) goes 47 km further in real −10 °C conditions.
- Skoda Enyaq 85 (2026–) spends 11 minutes less at fast chargers over a 600 km trip.
- Skoda Enyaq 85 (2026–) has 115 l more boot space.
Side by side
| Peugeot e-3008 325 Allure AWD (2026–) | Skoda Enyaq 85 (2026–) | |
|---|---|---|
| List price | €51,400 | €50,990 (better) |
| €/month (15,000 km) | €800 (better) | €826 |
| €/month (25,000 km) | €918 (better) | €931 |
| Range (WLTP) | 497 km | 580 km (better) |
| Footprint (L×W, excl. mirrors) | 8.61 m² | 8.75 m² |
| Used market (median listing, our own collection) | — | €34,660 · Ø 3.1 yr · n=32 (week 40, 2026) |
| Real range (mild/cold) | 446 km / 353 km | 520 km / 400 km (better) |
| 600 km long trip | 2 charging stops · +37 min | 1 charging stop · +26 min (better) |
| Consumption (WLTP) | 17.4 kWh/100 km | 15.2 kWh/100 km (better) |
| Battery | 73.0 kWh | 77.0 kWh |
| Max DC charge | 160 kW | 165 kW (better) |
| 0–100 km/h | 6.0 s (better) | 6.6 s |
| Boot | 470 L | 585 L (better) |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
Break-even by mileage
| km/yr | Peugeot e-3008 325 Allure AWD (2026–) | Skoda Enyaq 85 (2026–) |
|---|---|---|
| 10,000 | €741 | €773 |
| 15,000 | €800 | €826 |
| 20,000 | €859 | €879 |
| 25,000 | €918 | €931 |
| 30,000 | €976 | €983 |
Compare interactively → · Peugeot e-3008 325 Allure AWD (2026–): cost deep-dive · Skoda Enyaq 85 (2026–): cost deep-dive