MG MGS5 EV 64 kWh (2025–) vs Skoda Enyaq 60 Essence (2026–): which costs less?
Total cost at 15,000 km/yr: MG MGS5 EV 64 kWh (2025–) €715/mo · Skoda Enyaq 60 Essence (2026–) €721/mo. MG MGS5 EV 64 kWh (2025–) stays the cheaper car across all usage profiles (8,000–30,000 km/yr).
The trade-offs
- MG MGS5 EV 64 kWh (2025–) costs about €7 less per month at 15,000 km/yr.
- MG MGS5 EV 64 kWh (2025–) goes 20 km further in real −10 °C conditions.
- MG MGS5 EV 64 kWh (2025–) spends 3 minutes less at fast chargers over a 600 km trip.
- Skoda Enyaq 60 Essence (2026–) has 132 l more boot space.
Side by side
| MG MGS5 EV 64 kWh (2025–) | Skoda Enyaq 60 Essence (2026–) | |
|---|---|---|
| List price | €42,990 (better) | €43,490 |
| €/month (15,000 km) | €715 (better) | €721 |
| €/month (25,000 km) | €819 (better) | €823 |
| Range (WLTP) | 480 km (better) | 455 km |
| Footprint (L×W, excl. mirrors) | 8.28 m² | 8.75 m² |
| Used market (median listing, our own collection) | — | €34,660 · Ø 3.1 yr · n=32 (week 40, 2026) |
| Real range (mild/cold) | 430 km / 333 km (better) | 408 km / 313 km |
| 600 km long trip | 2 charging stops · +37 min (better) | 2 charging stops · +40 min |
| Consumption (WLTP) | 15.5 kWh/100 km | 15.0 kWh/100 km (better) |
| Battery | 62.1 kWh | 58.0 kWh |
| Max DC charge | 139 kW (better) | 105 kW |
| 0–100 km/h | 6.3 s (better) | 8.6 s |
| Boot | 453 L | 585 L (better) |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
Break-even by mileage
| km/yr | MG MGS5 EV 64 kWh (2025–) | Skoda Enyaq 60 Essence (2026–) |
|---|---|---|
| 10,000 | €662 | €670 |
| 15,000 | €715 | €721 |
| 20,000 | €767 | €772 |
| 25,000 | €819 | €823 |
| 30,000 | €871 | €873 |
Compare interactively → · MG MGS5 EV 64 kWh (2025–): cost deep-dive · Skoda Enyaq 60 Essence (2026–): cost deep-dive