Mercedes EQS SUV 450+ (2024–) vs Volvo EX90 Twin Motor Ultra AWD: which costs less?
Total cost at 15,000 km/yr: Mercedes EQS SUV 450+ (2024–) €1,442/mo · Volvo EX90 Twin Motor Ultra AWD €1,462/mo. Mercedes EQS SUV 450+ (2024–) stays the cheaper car across all usage profiles (8,000–30,000 km/yr).
The trade-offs
- Mercedes EQS SUV 450+ (2024–) costs about €20 less per month at 15,000 km/yr.
- Mercedes EQS SUV 450+ (2024–) goes 55 km further in real −10 °C conditions.
- Mercedes EQS SUV 450+ (2024–) spends 1 minute less at fast chargers over a 600 km trip.
- Mercedes EQS SUV 450+ (2024–) has 321 l more boot space.
Side by side
| Mercedes EQS SUV 450+ (2024–) | Volvo EX90 Twin Motor Ultra AWD | |
|---|---|---|
| List price | €110,991 | €101,790 (better) |
| €/month (15,000 km) | €1,442 (better) | €1,462 |
| €/month (25,000 km) | €1,601 (better) | €1,610 |
| Range (WLTP) | 698 km (better) | 625 km |
| Footprint (L×W, excl. mirrors) | 10.04 m² | 9.89 m² |
| Real range (mild/cold) | 626 km / 508 km (better) | 560 km / 453 km |
| 600 km long trip | 1 charging stop · +14 min (better) | 1 charging stop · +15 min |
| Consumption (WLTP) | 19.5 kWh/100 km | 19.2 kWh/100 km (better) |
| Battery | 118.0 kWh | 102.0 kWh |
| Max DC charge | 200 kW | 350 kW (better) |
| 0–100 km/h | 6.7 s | 5.5 s (better) |
| Boot | 645 L (better) | 324 L |
| Seats | 5 | 7 |
Break-even by mileage
| km/yr | Mercedes EQS SUV 450+ (2024–) | Volvo EX90 Twin Motor Ultra AWD |
|---|---|---|
| 10,000 | €1,362 | €1,387 |
| 15,000 | €1,442 | €1,462 |
| 20,000 | €1,522 | €1,536 |
| 25,000 | €1,601 | €1,610 |
| 30,000 | €1,679 | €1,684 |
Compare interactively → · Mercedes EQS SUV 450+ (2024–): cost deep-dive · Volvo EX90 Twin Motor Ultra AWD: cost deep-dive