Mercedes EQE SUV 350 4MATIC (2025–2026) vs Volvo EX90 Twin Motor Ultra AWD: which costs less?
Mercedes EQE SUV 350 4MATIC (2025–2026)€1,379/monthcheaper
Volvo EX90 Twin Motor Ultra AWD€1,462/monthTotal cost at 15,000 km/yr: Mercedes EQE SUV 350 4MATIC (2025–2026) €1,379/mo · Volvo EX90 Twin Motor Ultra AWD €1,462/mo. Mercedes EQE SUV 350 4MATIC (2025–2026) stays the cheaper car across all usage profiles (8,000–30,000 km/yr).
The trade-offs
- Mercedes EQE SUV 350 4MATIC (2025–2026) costs about €83 less per month at 15,000 km/yr.
- Volvo EX90 Twin Motor Ultra AWD goes 56 km further in real −10 °C conditions.
- Volvo EX90 Twin Motor Ultra AWD spends 19 minutes less at fast chargers over a 600 km trip.
- Mercedes EQE SUV 350 4MATIC (2025–2026) has 196 l more boot space.
Side by side
| Mercedes EQE SUV 350 4MATIC (2025–2026) | Volvo EX90 Twin Motor Ultra AWD | |
|---|---|---|
| List price | €105,553 | €101,790 (better) |
| €/month (15,000 km) | €1,379 (better) | €1,462 |
| €/month (25,000 km) | €1,534 (better) | €1,610 |
| Range (WLTP) | 547 km | 625 km (better) |
| Footprint (L×W, excl. mirrors) | 9.43 m² | 9.89 m² |
| Real range (mild/cold) | 490 km / 397 km | 560 km / 453 km (better) |
| 600 km long trip | 2 charging stops · +34 min | 1 charging stop · +15 min (better) |
| Consumption (WLTP) | 19.4 kWh/100 km | 19.2 kWh/100 km (better) |
| Battery | 90.5 kWh | 102.0 kWh |
| Max DC charge | 170 kW | 350 kW (better) |
| 0–100 km/h | 6.0 s | 5.5 s (better) |
| Boot | 520 L (better) | 324 L |
| Seats | 5 | 7 |
Break-even by mileage
| km/yr | Mercedes EQE SUV 350 4MATIC (2025–2026) | Volvo EX90 Twin Motor Ultra AWD |
|---|---|---|
| 10,000 | €1,300 | €1,387 |
| 15,000 | €1,379 | €1,462 |
| 20,000 | €1,457 | €1,536 |
| 25,000 | €1,534 | €1,610 |
| 30,000 | €1,611 | €1,684 |
Compare interactively → · Mercedes EQE SUV 350 4MATIC (2025–2026): cost deep-dive · Volvo EX90 Twin Motor Ultra AWD: cost deep-dive