Mercedes EQE 500 4MATIC (2025–) vs Volvo ES90 Twin Motor Ultra AWD (2025–): which costs less?
Mercedes EQE 500 4MATIC (2025–)€1,235/monthcheaper
Volvo ES90 Twin Motor Ultra AWD (2025–)€1,281/monthTotal cost at 15,000 km/yr: Mercedes EQE 500 4MATIC (2025–) €1,235/mo · Volvo ES90 Twin Motor Ultra AWD (2025–) €1,281/mo. Mercedes EQE 500 4MATIC (2025–) stays the cheaper car across all usage profiles (8,000–30,000 km/yr).
The trade-offs
- Mercedes EQE 500 4MATIC (2025–) costs about €46 less per month at 15,000 km/yr.
- Volvo ES90 Twin Motor Ultra AWD (2025–) goes 57 km further in real −10 °C conditions.
- Volvo ES90 Twin Motor Ultra AWD (2025–) spends 12 minutes less at fast chargers over a 600 km trip.
- Volvo ES90 Twin Motor Ultra AWD (2025–) has 12 l more boot space.
Side by side
| Mercedes EQE 500 4MATIC (2025–) | Volvo ES90 Twin Motor Ultra AWD (2025–) | |
|---|---|---|
| List price | €84,764 (better) | €88,290 |
| €/month (15,000 km) | €1,235 (better) | €1,281 |
| €/month (25,000 km) | €1,365 (better) | €1,410 |
| Range (WLTP) | 622 km | 706 km (better) |
| Footprint (L×W, excl. mirrors) | 9.70 m² | 9.71 m² |
| Real range (mild/cold) | 562 km / 442 km | 637 km / 499 km (better) |
| 600 km long trip | 1 charging stop · +21 min | 1 charging stop · +9 min (better) |
| Consumption (WLTP) | 16.9 kWh/100 km | 16.5 kWh/100 km (better) |
| Battery | 90.5 kWh | 103.0 kWh |
| Max DC charge | 170 kW | 350 kW (better) |
| 0–100 km/h | 4.4 s (better) | 5.4 s |
| Boot | 430 L | 442 L (better) |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
Break-even by mileage
| km/yr | Mercedes EQE 500 4MATIC (2025–) | Volvo ES90 Twin Motor Ultra AWD (2025–) |
|---|---|---|
| 10,000 | €1,169 | €1,216 |
| 15,000 | €1,235 | €1,281 |
| 20,000 | €1,300 | €1,346 |
| 25,000 | €1,365 | €1,410 |
| 30,000 | €1,430 | €1,474 |
Compare interactively → · Mercedes EQE 500 4MATIC (2025–): cost deep-dive · Volvo ES90 Twin Motor Ultra AWD (2025–): cost deep-dive