Lucid Gravity Touring AWD (2026–) vs Volvo ES90 Twin Motor Performance AWD (2025–): which costs less?
Lucid Gravity Touring AWD (2026–)€1,401/month
Volvo ES90 Twin Motor Performance AWD (2025–)€1,352/monthcheaperTotal cost at 15,000 km/yr: Lucid Gravity Touring AWD (2026–) €1,401/mo · Volvo ES90 Twin Motor Performance AWD (2025–) €1,352/mo. Volvo ES90 Twin Motor Performance AWD (2025–) stays the cheaper car across all usage profiles (8,000–30,000 km/yr).
The trade-offs
- Volvo ES90 Twin Motor Performance AWD (2025–) costs about €49 less per month at 15,000 km/yr.
- Volvo ES90 Twin Motor Performance AWD (2025–) goes 105 km further in real −10 °C conditions.
- Lucid Gravity Touring AWD (2026–) has 338 l more boot space.
Side by side
| Lucid Gravity Touring AWD (2026–) | Volvo ES90 Twin Motor Performance AWD (2025–) | |
|---|---|---|
| List price | €94,900 | €93,790 (better) |
| €/month (15,000 km) | €1,401 | €1,352 (better) |
| €/month (25,000 km) | €1,541 | €1,484 (better) |
| Range (WLTP) | 545 km | 706 km (better) |
| Footprint (L×W, excl. mirrors) | 10.07 m² | 9.71 m² |
| Real range (mild/cold) | 492 km / 394 km | 637 km / 499 km (better) |
| 600 km long trip | — | 1 charging stop · +9 min |
| Consumption (WLTP) | 18.4 kWh/100 km | 16.5 kWh/100 km (better) |
| Battery | 89.0 kWh | 103.0 kWh |
| Max DC charge | 250 kW | 350 kW (better) |
| 0–100 km/h | 4.2 s | 4.0 s (better) |
| Boot | 780 L (better) | 442 L |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
Break-even by mileage
| km/yr | Lucid Gravity Touring AWD (2026–) | Volvo ES90 Twin Motor Performance AWD (2025–) |
|---|---|---|
| 10,000 | €1,331 | €1,286 |
| 15,000 | €1,401 | €1,352 |
| 20,000 | €1,471 | €1,418 |
| 25,000 | €1,541 | €1,484 |
| 30,000 | €1,610 | €1,549 |
Compare interactively → · Lucid Gravity Touring AWD (2026–): cost deep-dive · Volvo ES90 Twin Motor Performance AWD (2025–): cost deep-dive