Ford Explorer Extended Range 77 AWD (2026–) vs Skoda Elroq 85x Sportline (2026–): which costs less?
Ford Explorer Extended Range 77 AWD (2026–)€752/month
Skoda Elroq 85x Sportline (2026–)€727/monthcheaperTotal cost at 15,000 km/yr: Ford Explorer Extended Range 77 AWD (2026–) €752/mo · Skoda Elroq 85x Sportline (2026–) €727/mo. Skoda Elroq 85x Sportline (2026–) stays the cheaper car across all usage profiles (8,000–30,000 km/yr).
The trade-offs
- Skoda Elroq 85x Sportline (2026–) costs about €25 less per month at 15,000 km/yr.
- Skoda Elroq 85x Sportline (2026–) goes 6 km further in real −10 °C conditions.
- Ford Explorer Extended Range 77 AWD (2026–) spends 1 minute less at fast chargers over a 600 km trip.
- Ford Explorer Extended Range 77 AWD (2026–) has 2 l more boot space.
Side by side
| Ford Explorer Extended Range 77 AWD (2026–) | Skoda Elroq 85x Sportline (2026–) | |
|---|---|---|
| List price | €52,900 | €52,740 (better) |
| €/month (15,000 km) | €752 | €727 (better) |
| €/month (25,000 km) | €867 | €841 (better) |
| Range (WLTP) | 553 km | 565 km (better) |
| Footprint (L×W, excl. mirrors) | 8.36 m² | 8.46 m² |
| Real range (mild/cold) | 496 km / 388 km | 506 km / 394 km (better) |
| 600 km long trip | 2 charging stops · +28 min (better) | 2 charging stops · +29 min |
| Consumption (WLTP) | 16.3 kWh/100 km | 15.9 kWh/100 km (better) |
| Battery | 77.0 kWh | 77.0 kWh |
| Max DC charge | 185 kW (better) | 165 kW |
| 0–100 km/h | 5.3 s (better) | 6.2 s |
| Boot | 472 L (better) | 470 L |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
Break-even by mileage
| km/yr | Ford Explorer Extended Range 77 AWD (2026–) | Skoda Elroq 85x Sportline (2026–) |
|---|---|---|
| 10,000 | €694 | €670 |
| 15,000 | €752 | €727 |
| 20,000 | €810 | €784 |
| 25,000 | €867 | €841 |
| 30,000 | €924 | €898 |
Compare interactively → · Ford Explorer Extended Range 77 AWD (2026–): cost deep-dive · Skoda Elroq 85x Sportline (2026–): cost deep-dive