Ford Capri Extended Range 77 AWD (2026–) vs Volvo EC40 Twin Motor AWD (2024–): which costs less?
Ford Capri Extended Range 77 AWD (2026–)€831/monthcheaper
Volvo EC40 Twin Motor AWD (2024–)€836/monthTotal cost at 15,000 km/yr: Ford Capri Extended Range 77 AWD (2026–) €831/mo · Volvo EC40 Twin Motor AWD (2024–) €836/mo. Ford Capri Extended Range 77 AWD (2026–) stays the cheaper car across all usage profiles (8,000–30,000 km/yr).
The trade-offs
- Ford Capri Extended Range 77 AWD (2026–) costs about €5 less per month at 15,000 km/yr.
- Volvo EC40 Twin Motor AWD (2024–) goes 7 km further in real −10 °C conditions.
- Ford Capri Extended Range 77 AWD (2026–) spends 1 minute less at fast chargers over a 600 km trip.
- Ford Capri Extended Range 77 AWD (2026–) has 168 l more boot space.
Side by side
| Ford Capri Extended Range 77 AWD (2026–) | Volvo EC40 Twin Motor AWD (2024–) | |
|---|---|---|
| List price | €60,400 (better) | €62,490 |
| €/month (15,000 km) | €831 (better) | €836 |
| €/month (25,000 km) | €949 (better) | €960 |
| Range (WLTP) | 551 km | 554 km (better) |
| Footprint (L×W, excl. mirrors) | 8.67 m² | 8.32 m² |
| Real range (mild/cold) | 494 km / 386 km | 497 km / 393 km (better) |
| 600 km long trip | 2 charging stops · +28 min (better) | 2 charging stops · +29 min |
| Consumption (WLTP) | 16.3 kWh/100 km (better) | 17.2 kWh/100 km |
| Battery | 77.0 kWh | 79.0 kWh |
| Max DC charge | 185 kW | 205 kW (better) |
| 0–100 km/h | 5.3 s | 4.7 s (better) |
| Boot | 572 L (better) | 404 L |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
Break-even by mileage
| km/yr | Ford Capri Extended Range 77 AWD (2026–) | Volvo EC40 Twin Motor AWD (2024–) |
|---|---|---|
| 10,000 | €771 | €774 |
| 15,000 | €831 | €836 |
| 20,000 | €890 | €898 |
| 25,000 | €949 | €960 |
| 30,000 | €1,008 | €1,021 |
Compare interactively → · Ford Capri Extended Range 77 AWD (2026–): cost deep-dive · Volvo EC40 Twin Motor AWD (2024–): cost deep-dive