Citroen e-Berlingo M 50 kWh (2024–) vs Toyota Proace City Verso Electric 50 kWh (2024–2026): which costs less?
Citroen e-Berlingo M 50 kWh (2024–)€684/month
Toyota Proace City Verso Electric 50 kWh (2024–2026)€644/monthcheaperTotal cost at 15,000 km/yr: Citroen e-Berlingo M 50 kWh (2024–) €684/mo · Toyota Proace City Verso Electric 50 kWh (2024–2026) €644/mo. Toyota Proace City Verso Electric 50 kWh (2024–2026) stays the cheaper car across all usage profiles (8,000–30,000 km/yr).
The trade-offs
- Toyota Proace City Verso Electric 50 kWh (2024–2026) costs about €40 less per month at 15,000 km/yr.
- Toyota Proace City Verso Electric 50 kWh (2024–2026) goes 1 km further in real −10 °C conditions.
- Citroen e-Berlingo M 50 kWh (2024–) spends 2 minutes less at fast chargers over a 600 km trip.
- Citroen e-Berlingo M 50 kWh (2024–) has 134 l more boot space.
Side by side
| Citroen e-Berlingo M 50 kWh (2024–) | Toyota Proace City Verso Electric 50 kWh (2024–2026) | |
|---|---|---|
| List price | €39,720 | €38,830 (better) |
| €/month (15,000 km) | €684 | €644 (better) |
| €/month (25,000 km) | €796 | €758 (better) |
| Range (WLTP) | 343 km | 343 km |
| Footprint (L×W, excl. mirrors) | 8.14 m² | 8.13 m² |
| Real range (mild/cold) | 310 km / 247 km | 310 km / 248 km (better) |
| 600 km long trip | 3 charging stops · +73 min (better) | 3 charging stops · +75 min |
| Consumption (WLTP) | 18.0 kWh/100 km (better) | 18.1 kWh/100 km |
| Battery | 46.0 kWh | 46.0 kWh |
| Max DC charge | 100 kW | 100 kW |
| 0–100 km/h | 11.7 s | — |
| Boot | 775 L (better) | 641 L |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
Break-even by mileage
| km/yr | Citroen e-Berlingo M 50 kWh (2024–) | Toyota Proace City Verso Electric 50 kWh (2024–2026) |
|---|---|---|
| 10,000 | €628 | €587 |
| 15,000 | €684 | €644 |
| 20,000 | €740 | €702 |
| 25,000 | €796 | €758 |
| 30,000 | €852 | €815 |
Compare interactively → · Citroen e-Berlingo M 50 kWh (2024–): cost deep-dive · Toyota Proace City Verso Electric 50 kWh (2024–2026): cost deep-dive