Cadillac Optiq Premium Sport AWD (2026–) vs Peugeot e-5008 230 Long Range (2025–): which costs less?
Cadillac Optiq Premium Sport AWD (2026–)€967/monthcheaper
Peugeot e-5008 230 Long Range (2025–)€970/monthTotal cost at 15,000 km/yr: Cadillac Optiq Premium Sport AWD (2026–) €967/mo · Peugeot e-5008 230 Long Range (2025–) €970/mo. From roughly 20,000 km/yr the picture flips — the other model becomes cheaper.
The trade-offs
- Cadillac Optiq Premium Sport AWD (2026–) costs about €3 less per month at 15,000 km/yr.
- Peugeot e-5008 230 Long Range (2025–) goes 170 km further in real −10 °C conditions.
- Peugeot e-5008 230 Long Range (2025–) spends 41 minutes less at fast chargers over a 600 km trip.
- Cadillac Optiq Premium Sport AWD (2026–) has 95 l more boot space.
Side by side
| Cadillac Optiq Premium Sport AWD (2026–) | Peugeot e-5008 230 Long Range (2025–) | |
|---|---|---|
| List price | €65,000 | €63,350 (better) |
| €/month (15,000 km) | €967 (better) | €970 |
| €/month (25,000 km) | €1,103 | €1,096 (better) |
| Range (WLTP) | 425 km | 669 km (better) |
| Footprint (L×W, excl. mirrors) | 9.22 m² | 9.08 m² |
| Real range (mild/cold) | 381 km / 310 km | 600 km / 480 km (better) |
| 600 km long trip | 2 charging stops · +59 min | 1 charging stop · +18 min (better) |
| Consumption (WLTP) | 19.9 kWh/100 km | 18.1 kWh/100 km (better) |
| Battery | 75.0 kWh | 96.9 kWh |
| Max DC charge | 110 kW | 160 kW (better) |
| 0–100 km/h | 6.3 s (better) | 9.6 s |
| Boot | 443 L (better) | 348 L |
| Seats | 5 | 7 |
Break-even by mileage
| km/yr | Cadillac Optiq Premium Sport AWD (2026–) | Peugeot e-5008 230 Long Range (2025–) |
|---|---|---|
| 10,000 | €899 | €907 |
| 15,000 | €967 | €970 |
| 20,000 | €1,035 | €1,033 |
| 25,000 | €1,103 | €1,096 |
| 30,000 | €1,171 | €1,159 |
Compare interactively → · Cadillac Optiq Premium Sport AWD (2026–): cost deep-dive · Peugeot e-5008 230 Long Range (2025–): cost deep-dive