BYD ATTO 2 64.8 kWh (2025–) vs Hyundai Kona Electric 65: which costs less?
Total cost at 15,000 km/yr: BYD ATTO 2 64.8 kWh (2025–) €713/mo · Hyundai Kona Electric 65 €762/mo. BYD ATTO 2 64.8 kWh (2025–) stays the cheaper car across all usage profiles (8,000–30,000 km/yr).
The trade-offs
- BYD ATTO 2 64.8 kWh (2025–) costs about €49 less per month at 15,000 km/yr.
- Hyundai Kona Electric 65 goes 46 km further in real −10 °C conditions.
- BYD ATTO 2 64.8 kWh (2025–) spends 6 minutes less at fast chargers over a 600 km trip.
- Hyundai Kona Electric 65 has 16 l more boot space.
Side by side
| BYD ATTO 2 64.8 kWh (2025–) | Hyundai Kona Electric 65 | |
|---|---|---|
| List price | €41,990 (better) | €45,340 |
| €/month (15,000 km) | €713 (better) | €762 |
| €/month (25,000 km) | €826 (better) | €863 |
| Range (WLTP) | 430 km | 514 km (better) |
| Footprint (L×W, excl. mirrors) | 7.89 m² | 7.95 m² |
| Used market (median listing, our own collection) | — | €20,977 · Ø 4.2 yr · n=20 (week 40, 2026) |
| Real range (mild/cold) | 385 km / 306 km | 461 km / 352 km (better) |
| 600 km long trip | 2 charging stops · +42 min (better) | 2 charging stops · +48 min |
| Consumption (WLTP) | 17.4 kWh/100 km | 14.7 kWh/100 km (better) |
| Battery | 64.8 kWh | 65.4 kWh |
| Max DC charge | 155 kW (better) | 102 kW |
| 0–100 km/h | 7.9 s | 7.8 s (better) |
| Boot | 450 L | 466 L (better) |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
Break-even by mileage
| km/yr | BYD ATTO 2 64.8 kWh (2025–) | Hyundai Kona Electric 65 |
|---|---|---|
| 10,000 | €657 | €712 |
| 15,000 | €713 | €762 |
| 20,000 | €770 | €812 |
| 25,000 | €826 | €863 |
| 30,000 | €882 | €913 |
Compare interactively → · BYD ATTO 2 64.8 kWh (2025–): cost deep-dive · Hyundai Kona Electric 65: cost deep-dive