Alpine A390 GTS (2026–) vs Ford Mustang Mach-E GT AWD (2025–): which costs less?
Total cost at 15,000 km/yr: Alpine A390 GTS (2026–) €1,121/mo · Ford Mustang Mach-E GT AWD (2025–) €1,109/mo. Ford Mustang Mach-E GT AWD (2025–) stays the cheaper car across all usage profiles (8,000–30,000 km/yr).
The trade-offs
- Ford Mustang Mach-E GT AWD (2025–) costs about €12 less per month at 15,000 km/yr.
- Ford Mustang Mach-E GT AWD (2025–) goes 11 km further in real −10 °C conditions.
- Alpine A390 GTS (2026–) spends 11 minutes less at fast chargers over a 600 km trip.
- Alpine A390 GTS (2026–) has 13 l more boot space.
Side by side
| Alpine A390 GTS (2026–) | Ford Mustang Mach-E GT AWD (2025–) | |
|---|---|---|
| List price | €78,000 | €78,000 |
| €/month (15,000 km) | €1,121 | €1,109 (better) |
| €/month (25,000 km) | €1,266 | €1,256 (better) |
| Range (WLTP) | 503 km | 515 km (better) |
| Footprint (L×W, excl. mirrors) | 8.70 m² | 8.92 m² |
| Real range (mild/cold) | 451 km / 369 km | 462 km / 380 km (better) |
| 600 km long trip | 2 charging stops · +31 min (better) | 2 charging stops · +42 min |
| Consumption (WLTP) | 20.4 kWh/100 km (better) | 21.0 kWh/100 km |
| Battery | 89.0 kWh | 91.0 kWh |
| Max DC charge | 190 kW (better) | 150 kW |
| 0–100 km/h | 3.9 s | 3.8 s (better) |
| Boot | 532 L (better) | 519 L |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
Break-even by mileage
| km/yr | Alpine A390 GTS (2026–) | Ford Mustang Mach-E GT AWD (2025–) |
|---|---|---|
| 10,000 | €1,048 | €1,035 |
| 15,000 | €1,121 | €1,109 |
| 20,000 | €1,194 | €1,183 |
| 25,000 | €1,266 | €1,256 |
| 30,000 | €1,337 | €1,329 |
Compare interactively → · Alpine A390 GTS (2026–): cost deep-dive · Ford Mustang Mach-E GT AWD (2025–): cost deep-dive